|
|
They are “Validated Corner Record” . It gives original source, chaining Index factors, True Bearings and relation to other corners. A well-documented record.
0016849.pdf
0016850.pdf
|
I believe this is the first actual monument I’ve seen that is still in existence.
0015487.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vol271p660-697.pdf Read the note on Page 684
|
Compare the State copy of these plats with the BLM copy
T29R30-BLM.pdf
T29R30-State.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the attached plat, located the W1/4 corner of Section 14 in the field notes.
Pages from T37R29 BLM.pdf
Vol264 p280.pdf
|
Lots of interesting things in this plat, Note Government Lots along the entire exterior of this plat, the east line of section 15
T40R26-BLM.pdf
|
|
then.pdf and now.pdf
The now is based on a survey recorded in US PB 3 pages 1-84 Collier County Florida Public Records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A True living Section corner, is where it falls. How would this stand up to the standards of today?
Mann-November-1938.pdf
|
|
|
|
Have you seen these stampings on a monument ?
Do you think coordinates and elevations should be stamped on a monument?
0094004.pdf 0094005.pdf 0094006.pdf
|
|
|
|
Read the attached General Land Office field notes ”Volume 271 pages 684-694”, Lester S. Mann Public Land Surveyor
Vol271 P684-694.pdf
Sets Collier County monuments for the originals.
(These Collier County marks sound more like Collier Company monuments what do you think?).
|
|
Review the attached plats of T36 R37 and T37 R37. Do you see anything unusual about the common township line?” T36R37-BLM.pdf T37R37-State.pdf
Now look at the plat of T36 R36. Is your answer still the same? T36R36-BLM.pdf
What is your conclusion?
|
|
|
History of South Florida Corps of Engineers Chapter 5, (see attachment “river int chap o05.pdf”) “Flexing the Environmental Muscle: The Cross Florida Barge Canal, the Everglades Jetport, and Big Cypress Swamp”)
river_int_chap_05.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compare the west line of Section 31, Township 28 South, Range 29 East (T28R29-BLM.pdf) with the East line of Section 36, Township 28 South, Range 28 East (T28R28-BLM.pdf).
Then compare the field notes for the exterior lines of both townships (same surveyor, Vol 110 p28-34.pdf) with the note for the North line of Section 31 Township 28 South, Range. 29 East at the bottom of page 15 of the original notes in (Vol 201 p164.pdf).
Which plat is correct or are there two corners?
Field Notes: FB-B21.pdf FB-B22.pdf FB-B23.pdf
|
Download Quad Map (DRG) from Labins - state plane ftp://data.labins.org/drg/StPl/
View Quad Index in Google Earth quad.kml
|
|
|
NL104002_83Model.pdf
survey completed by Mr. Ed Scott, PSM
|
277p27.pdf
What is a 1/256 corner? What are AP ? Have you ever seen them used in this way? What is the standard material for a corner set? Do you believe the corner note for Sections 8,9,16 and 17?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the PE’s certification on the map: Plat Book 1 Page 140 BS 1915.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no telling where you will find original sectional data: Plat Book 9 page 30 Highlands Co PR.pdf
What do you think about Plat Book 1, page 7? Plat Book 1 Page 7 Highlands Co PR.pdf
|
|
Official Map St. Augustine Cover.tif
Official Map St. Augustine.tif Thanks to Gail Oliver of St. Johns County Land Management Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between the State’s copies of T67R27 and the BLM’s copy?
Note that there is another reference on the BLM copy entered on "island land tract book”. What is that referring to?
|
|
|
|
T48 R36 BLM Dependent Survey.pdf
T48 R36 BLM Letter.pdf (Without the letter you might survey the wrong stuff)
|
Look at the BLM Copies and then look at the States copies of this Township and Range, notice anything different?
T43 R27 State.pdf -vs- T43 R27 BLM.pdf
|
|
T51 R41 BLM.pdf (Note: Right of Way Shown on Dependent Resurvey)
|
|
Last weeks map was a plat by the GLO in the patent. This weeks map ties in to that survey and extends it several townships to the South and it is in NAD27 State Plane, very high tech for the time. It also has a T.I.I.T.F. Resolution and field notes. The map is a Reconnaissance Survey. I’m not sure what that is, but if you follow the notes they set section corners like a survey or a dependant resurvey or a resurvey or even a boundary type survey. Read the field notes they are very interesting. If you’ve worked in or visited the park you will understand what they are talking about. I wonder if this is one of the first “Surveyor’s Reports”. Also there is a possible mistake with one of the corners, can you find it?
I don’t believe that the map is readily posted to any website. If you know of it please share it.
A plot of that data on a 2004 aerial: plot.jpg Reconnaissance Survey: T59 R37 S13 Prewitt-Nall.pdf TIITF Resolution: TIITF Resolution.pdf Field Notes: Field Notes Vol273 p388-402.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boundary Survey of the Everglades National Park by ER Brownell in 1967 and a map by Prewitt & Nall 1955 &1956 of the Flamingo area.
Everglades National Park.pdf T60 R33 Prewitt Nall 1955-1956.pdf
|
This week’s map of the week is a 1946 Survey by Mr. Carl Johnson of Various lines in that part of Township 40 S., Rge. 38 E. and Township 41S., Rge. 38E. This survey was used in an agreement in Deed Book 1010, page 390. USSC-Chastain DB 1010 pg 390.pdf
In Twp. 40 S., Rge. 38 E. the North boundary was surveyed in 1853 by M.A. Williams Deputy Surveyor and the East, West and South, Boundaries of the Township and the Section lines were survey in 1855 by William J. Reyes.
In Twp. 40 S., Rge. 38 E. the North and East boundaries were surveyed by A.H. Jones in 1845 and the section lines were survey by Wm. J. Reyes in 1855.
The South Boundary was survey in 1916 by the State Surveyor Otis A. Hardin. The West boundary was surveyed in 1855 by W.J. Reyes. Mr. Johnson’s survey protracted the remaining sections.
T40R38 BLM.pdf
T40R38S3,4&7-36 Johnson Johnson 1946.pdf
T41R38 BLM.pdf
T42S R38E_053.tif
Following are his field notes. Please take time to go through them, they are excellent.
USSC FB U98.pdf
USSC FB U99.pdf
USSC FB V96.pdf
USSC FB V98.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the January 4, 2008 map of the week the question was asked "what does B.B.T. stand for?"
see FB73Hp7and8.pdf
|
The Map of the Week coincides with the aerial from last week. Note the detail in the field notes.
DOC08040e.pdf
FB5G.pdf
|